grabklion.blogg.se - Cetus3d vs prusa

I'll print out some samples and post them for comparison. Posted by: Yeah, the problem is that they do sag 😕.

Maker's Muse has a good video on this topic. Design the part as sub-components that can be assembled after printing.

If these are your designs, include some break-away supports at key points. Try to design the part or position the print so the ugly supported surfaces are not visible.

As Joan notes, reorienting the part works, but may introduce weaknesses along the horizontal axis.

Your best strategy is avoiding the need for supports as much as possible. Appearance is still not quite as nice as regular surfaces IMO. After printing, the supports are dissolved. Supported surfaces are fully supported by the dissolvable material.

Print with dissolvable supports with no gap.

There is no underlying layer to squish against, so extrusions come out round and stringy, with poor visual appearance. This small gap means that the supported surface is literally printed in air above the supports.

Print supports underneath the supported surface with a small gap in order for the supports to be removable.When parts must be printed above supports, there are two options: You can tweak settings to an extent, but supports are always a compromise. You are running into a limitation of current consumer-grade FFF printing, regardless of manufacturer. There are real world complex parts, where different orientation is not an option. Posted by: particular part is just for demonstrational purposes, an example.